Research by Chapter 01
Next chapter

How portfolios are reviewed

The first pass is a scan, not a read

Before a reviewer reads a single case study, they have already decided whether to keep going. This chapter shows how much weight the portfolio carries in that decision, how little time it gets, and what happens to the portfolios that make it to a second read.

The portfolio beats experience

78% rely on the portfolio and case studies to judge whether a candidate is a fit. It outweighs industry experience, the CV, and the name of any past employer.

Under four minutes per portfolio

65% of reviewers spend under four minutes on a portfolio the first time they open it. Volume sets the pace, as one in ten reviewed more than 200 portfolios last year.

The scan comes first, then the read

The scan is a gate. The real read comes later, when a shortlisted candidate's case studies get up to 30 minutes of close attention. So the portfolio has two jobs: be easy to skim in minutes, and hold up under a close read.

Most teams don’t screen with AI

Where AI appears, it mostly ranks portfolios for a human reviewer. The reader is a busy person with a specific role in mind, not a keyword filter.

About sections still count

53% of reviewers rate an about section as important. They want a sense of your career path and tone of voice, but personal details matter less.

The story has to match

Reviewers cross-check the portfolio against the CV and LinkedIn. Roles, dates, and responsibilities are compared, and inconsistencies and careless errors are early red flags.

← Intro